Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
the elasticity of something that can be stretched and returns to its original length
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
take is the dictionary opposite of gives, yet this model puts it closer than 28 of the 30 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to gives, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 30 of 43 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
take is the dictionary opposite of gives, yet this model puts it closer than 22 of the 30 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to gives, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 30 of 43 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
take is the dictionary opposite of gives, yet this model puts it closer than 26 of the 30 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to gives, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 30 of 43 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to gives. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to gives. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to gives. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.