1
Your word
measured
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
the quality of being able to perform; a quality that permits or facilitates achievement or accomplishment
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
inability is the dictionary opposite of abilities, yet this model puts it closer than 1 of the 2 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to abilities, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary.
inability is the dictionary opposite of abilities, yet this model puts it closer than 1 of the 2 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to abilities, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary.
inability is the dictionary opposite of abilities, yet this model puts it closer than 1 of the 2 synonyms it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to abilities, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to abilities. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to abilities. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to abilities. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.