“he gave credence to the gossip”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
the mental attitude that something is believable and should be accepted as true
aceptación is Spanish for acceptance, and every measurement below was made on that English word. Definitions come from English WordNet; Open Multilingual WordNet supplies the Spanish headword, not a Spanish definition.
Panels 3, 4 and 5 are computed per model. Switch to see them disagree.
“he gave credence to the gossip”
Definitions come from WordNet, a hand-curated dictionary.
This panel splits aceptación itself, not acceptance — a tokenizer does not care what language it is fed. It is the only panel here that does.
This is the tokenizer splitting text, not the model understanding it.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to acceptance, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 1 of 7 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
rejection is the dictionary opposite of acceptance, yet this model puts it closer than every one of the 1 synonym it can score. Opposites share the sentences a word lives in, so cosine alone cannot tell them apart - which is why the dictionary seeds this list rather than the geometry.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to acceptance. 1 of 7 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Shade shows how close the model puts each word to acceptance, 1 of 8 also appear in the dictionary. 1 of 7 dictionary synonyms are in this build; the rest have no vector to compare yet.
Model neighbours are distributional, not dictionary synonyms. Two words can be close because they appear in similar sentences, which is why an antonym can outscore a synonym here.
Scores are projections onto axes we defined from anchor words, not labels the model assigns.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to acceptance. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to acceptance. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These sit just outside the closest neighbours in panel 3, and no dictionary lists any of them as related to acceptance. That gap is the model’s own learned association.
These are statistical associations in the training data, not the model thinking.